Close Menu
Finletix
  • Home
  • AI
  • Financial
  • Investments
  • Small Business
  • Stocks
  • Tech
  • Marketing
What's Hot

Wells Fargo’s trade ideas for the third quarter

July 8, 2025

Alex Kendall of Wayve brings the future of autonomous AI to Disrupt 2025

July 8, 2025

Exploring the future of voice AI with Mati Staniszewski at Disrupt 2025

July 8, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Finletix
  • Home
  • AI
  • Financial
  • Investments
  • Small Business
  • Stocks
  • Tech
  • Marketing
Finletix
Home » China’s weaponisation of rare earths is a new kind of trade war
Financial

China’s weaponisation of rare earths is a new kind of trade war

arthursheikin@gmail.comBy arthursheikin@gmail.comJuly 8, 2025No Comments4 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Telegram Pinterest Tumblr Reddit WhatsApp Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favourite stories in this weekly newsletter.

The writer is the author of ‘Chip War’ and adviser to Vulcan Elements

Shortly after Beijing announced new restrictions on exporting rare earth minerals and the specialised magnets they make, the world’s auto industry warned of shortages that could force factory closures. China’s skilful deployment of rare earth sanctions this spring was probably the key factor in forcing Washington to reverse its tariff rises on the country. They represent a new era of Chinese economic statecraft — evidence of a sanctions policy capable of pressuring not only small neighbours but also the world’s largest economy.

China has been a prolific user of economic sanctions in recent years, but many of its efforts have been blunt and only partially effective. Punitive measures have often been hidden and even officially denied. Chinese tour groups lost interest in visiting the Philippines, we were told; while Taiwanese pineapples couldn’t meet health standards and Chinese consumers simply didn’t want to buy Korean products.

Government-backed boycotts have imposed economic costs on China’s trade partners, but their record at achieving political goals has been mixed. They seem to have prevented some countries from hosting the Dalai Lama or challenging Beijing’s nine-dash line in the South China Sea. Yet they have proved less impactful when core national interests are at stake.

Australia didn’t cave when China cut wine purchases over foreign policy disputes, for example. Nor did South Korea remove a missile defence system it installed in 2016, despite China imposing sanctions and demanding its withdrawal. And China’s earlier sanctions against the US — including blacklisting defence companies and imposing licensing regimes on certain mineral exports — have been more political signal than economic substance.

The new controls on exporting rare earth materials and magnets are different. In just a handful of weeks they threatened to shutter key factories across the auto industry — the largest manufacturing sector in most advanced economies. They also brought the US president to heel on his signature initiative: the trade war.

The White House thought it had achieved escalation dominance. Its theory was that sky-high tariffs would be so costly that Beijing would have no hope but to negotiate. In fact, China’s leaders could swallow the political cost of tariffs. But Washington couldn’t ignore the loss of rare earth materials and its impact on auto companies.

Why did these sanctions prove so much more effective than prior efforts? Partly because Beijing has been improving its toolkit, building a legal regime to cut strategic exports and improve knowledge of trade partners’ pain points. China has even made this extraterritorial, demanding that companies in other countries not use Chinese minerals to make products for the US defence industry. Beijing bet that other major trading partners would not blame it for the rare earth restrictions but instead push Washington to roll back tariffs.

Indeed, since April, Chinese exports of rare earth minerals and magnets have fallen not only to the US, but to other major trading partners such as Japan and South Korea. Indian automakers have cut production in the face of materials shortages. European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen brought a rare earth magnet to the June G7 meeting to call for more non-China production. The EU is prioritising rare earth exports in its diplomacy with China.

This broad global impact suggests that China’s ability to precisely target rare earth restrictions may still be limited. It’s harder to restrict resale of commodities like rare earth oxides than, say, jet engines or chipmaking equipment. If China wanted only to cut rare earth materials from reaching the US it might struggle to do so. Companies in other countries could continue to quietly sell to American customers.

Still, the most striking aspect of China’s weaponisation of rare earths is how unprepared western governments and companies were. Even those who cannot name a single rare earth element know that China dominates their production. Nevertheless, over the decade and a half since China first cut rare earth exports to Japan in 2011, the west has failed to find new suppliers.

Some modest steps were taken. Korea expanded its stockpiles. Japan invested in Australian mines. Yet most western governments devised critical minerals strategies and then chose not to fund them. Manufacturers speak of resilience yet some keep only a week’s supply of rare earth magnets in their inventories. This is a weapon they have been staring at for decades. They should not have been surprised when Beijing finally pulled the trigger.



Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Previous ArticleShein files for Hong Kong IPO to pressure UK to save London listing
Next Article What Trump’s sweeping domestic policy law means for American workers
arthursheikin@gmail.com
  • Website

Related Posts

Monzo fined £21mn after high-risk clients gave addresses such as Buckingham Palace

July 8, 2025

The markets just don’t believe Trump on tariffs

July 8, 2025

Shein files for Hong Kong IPO to pressure UK to save London listing

July 8, 2025
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Top Posts

Trump says a new 50% tariff on copper imports is coming

July 8, 2025

Wall Street is calling Trump’s bluff

July 8, 2025

After Diddy’s conviction, here’s where his business ventures stand

July 8, 2025

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Subscribe my Newsletter for New Posts & tips Let's stay updated!

Welcome to Finletix — Your Insight Hub for Smarter Financial Decisions

At Finletix, we’re dedicated to delivering clear, actionable, and timely insights across the financial landscape. Whether you’re an investor tracking market trends, a small business owner navigating economic shifts, or a tech enthusiast exploring AI’s role in finance — Finletix is your go-to resource.

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest YouTube
Top Insights

Monzo fined £21mn after high-risk clients gave addresses such as Buckingham Palace

July 8, 2025

The markets just don’t believe Trump on tariffs

July 8, 2025

China’s weaponisation of rare earths is a new kind of trade war

July 8, 2025
Get Informed

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Subscribe my Newsletter for New Posts & tips Let's stay updated!

© 2025 finletix. Designed by finletix.
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us
  • DMCA
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.